Tags
- Detainee Inquiry
- Early Day Motions
- GCHQ
- Gender
- General Election
- Intelligence agencies & the media
- Intelligence and Security Committee
- Investigatory Powers Act
- Investigatory Powers Review
- Investigatory Powers Tribunal
- ISC Appointments
- ISC Chair
- ISC evidence
- ISC leaks
- ISC repors
- MI5
- Privy Council
- public opinion
- RIPA
- Scottish independence
- Snowden
- Terrorism
- Watching the Watchers book
- Wilson Doctrine
-
Recent Posts
- When will the Intelligence and Security Committee be appointed and what is on the committee’s agenda?
- What impact has the general election had on the work of the Intelligence and Security Committee?
- The government’s refusal to release the Intelligence and Security Committee’s report into Russian activities against the UK is part of a worrying pattern of obstruction and delay
- International Women’s Day 2020: a survey of women’s presence on intelligence oversight committees
- Spies in Parliament: not as unusual as you might think
Recent Comments
- babr on New appointment to the Intelligence and Security Committee
- Bachelor of Interior Program Telkom University on Contrasting responses to US surveillance in Germany and the UK
- Spies in Parliament: not as unusual as you might think – PSA Parliaments on Spies in Parliament: not as unusual as you might think
- David Boothroyd on Spies in Parliament: not as unusual as you might think
- The Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee: a committee in decline? – PSA Parliaments Group on New Book – Watching the Watchers: Parliament and the Intelligence Services
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: Investigatory Powers Tribunal
Stalling in the Wilson Doctrine debate
A version of this post first appeared on The Conversation blog on 22 October 2015. The so-called Wilson Doctrine, a parliamentary convention which has, for almost fifty years, protected the communications of parliamentarians from interception by the intelligence and security … Continue reading
Is the Wilson Doctrine dead?
The judgement of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) last week that the so-called Wilson Doctrine has no basis in law and that parliamentarians could not reasonably expect the Doctrine to be applied in practice, have raised further questions about the … Continue reading