Tags
- Detainee Inquiry
- Early Day Motions
- GCHQ
- Gender
- General Election
- Intelligence agencies & the media
- Intelligence and Security Committee
- Investigatory Powers Act
- Investigatory Powers Review
- Investigatory Powers Tribunal
- ISC Appointments
- ISC Chair
- ISC evidence
- ISC leaks
- ISC repors
- MI5
- Privy Council
- public opinion
- RIPA
- Scottish independence
- Snowden
- Terrorism
- Watching the Watchers book
- Wilson Doctrine
-
Recent Posts
- When will the Intelligence and Security Committee be appointed and what is on the committee’s agenda?
- What impact has the general election had on the work of the Intelligence and Security Committee?
- The government’s refusal to release the Intelligence and Security Committee’s report into Russian activities against the UK is part of a worrying pattern of obstruction and delay
- International Women’s Day 2020: a survey of women’s presence on intelligence oversight committees
- Spies in Parliament: not as unusual as you might think
Recent Comments
- babr on New appointment to the Intelligence and Security Committee
- Bachelor of Interior Program Telkom University on Contrasting responses to US surveillance in Germany and the UK
- Spies in Parliament: not as unusual as you might think – PSA Parliaments on Spies in Parliament: not as unusual as you might think
- David Boothroyd on Spies in Parliament: not as unusual as you might think
- The Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee: a committee in decline? – PSA Parliaments Group on New Book – Watching the Watchers: Parliament and the Intelligence Services
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: Investigatory Powers Review
MI5 on the BBC: more PR than scrutiny
This post first appeared on the Democratic Audit blog on 6th October 2015. Public statements by heads of the British intelligence and security agencies are still rare enough to attract considerable attention. Moreover, representatives of the intelligence agencies do not step … Continue reading
Submission to Investigatory Powers Review
This is our submission to the Investigatory Powers Review, currently being undertaken by David Anderson, QC, the Government’s Independent Reviewer of Anti-Terrorism Legislation. The review was announced by the Home Secretary in July to look in particular at: the capabilities … Continue reading